1.2 What is neuropedagogy

Strictly speaking, the term neuroscience has always referred to the investigation of the structure and functioning of the nervous system from a physiological perspective and, therefore, would be equivalent to the branch of neurobiology. For this reason, in its beginnings, the concept of educational neuroscience only appealed to neurological studies on the functioning of the brain that were related to learning and memory. However, in recent years, we have found that the scientific evidence on how the brain learns that is most relevant to educational practice, comes especially from cognitive psychology and related disciplines. That is why the term educational neuroscience has been increasingly used in a broader sense than the original, grouping these disciplines under the same umbrella  (Howard-Jones, 2010). In other words, the term has become synonymous with any discipline that uses the scientific method to analyze how we learn and specifically, in the field at hand, the sciences that study educational phenomena: pedagogy (neuropedagogy).

Neuropedagogy aims to build the educational process taking into account data on brain development, on effective methods of learning and teaching, on the organization of the brain from the peculiarities of brain development of students and educators. Thus, for its development, the contributions of pedagogy, psychology, physiology, and other cognitive sciences are taken into account.

For example, neurobiology investigates how learning occurs at the molecular, cellular, and organ and system levels, studying how the nervous subsystem acts as a physical support for learning-related phenomena. In recent decades, this discipline has benefited greatly from the possibility of “seeing” the brain of a healthy person in functioning while performing mental or motor actions, being able to appreciate which regions of the brain are activated above the usual.

Cognitive psychology is at a different level of study, which investigates how the brain obtains, manipulates, and stores information. This discipline does not study the physiology of the brain, but models its functioning from the evaluation of the changes that certain sensory or motor experiences cause in the behavior and skills of people, so it is much more capable of guiding us in educational practice than neurobiology. Cognitive psychology draws on advances in neurobiology to support its models and theories, acting as a bridge between scientific advances in how the brain works and education.

The main objective of neuropedagogy is, taking into account the individual characteristics of students and teachers, to analyze what are the optimal and most creative strategies for solving educational problems, using knowledge about the individual characteristics of brain organization and higher mental functions. For example, the different strategies between boys and girls, left-handed and right-handed and how these change in the various educational stages are analyzed.

In this way, neuropedagogy advances through some basic principles of the educational process such as:

  • Offer ample opportunities for students to participate in a variety of content and forms of learning and cognitive activities, using different learning methods and techniques adapted to the age and characteristics of the students.
  • Create an environment and circumstances suitable to satisfy the innate curiosity of the human being to learn (including eating and physical activity).
  • Enhance the connections between what is already known and new learning. Understanding and learning occurs when the brain finds support in existing knowledge and perceptions.
  • Organize the learning sequence logically so that the brain can create the connections properly. Chance and chaos complicate productive brain activity.
  • Take into account emotions as a necessary element for productive brain activity. Learnings acquired in a favorable atmosphere are better remembered and establish more stable connections.
  • Present the didactic material in a way that constantly interacts the general and the particular, induction and deduction. Analysis and synthesis are two thought processes in constant interaction in learning.

Have internal factors (previous experience, emotional state, level of motivation, individual characteristics of the student, etc.) and external or peripheral perception of the learning environment (general environment in the classroom, sound, light, etc.).

Neuropedagogy aims to build the educational process taking into account data on brain development, on effective methods of learning and teaching, on the organization of the brain from the peculiarities of brain development of students and educators. Thus, for its development, the contributions of pedagogy, psychology, physiology, and other cognitive sciences are taken into account.

Different terms associated with neuropedagogy.

There are many terms associated with neuropedagogy, which, although they have slight differences, all could be used as synonyms at one time or another. The most common are Neurolearning, Neurodidactics and Neuroeducation.

  • Neurolearning. Study the link between the brain and learning. For example, because there are certain moments in human development more sensitive than others for the development of certain learnings (Sousa, 2016).
  • Neurodidactics. It is, without a doubt, the term closest to Neuropedagogy. It is the science that studies the adequacy of the didactic action to the brain functioning of each individual. That is, it studies the most appropriate way of teaching for each of the ways of learning (Tokuhama-Espinosa, 2010).
  • Neuroeducation. It is the most general term and is defined as the science that establishes the links between neuroscience and its applications in education (Bruer, 2008).

In summary, we could say that Neuroeducation would be the most generic term that would encompass Neurolearning, closely linked to psychology (evolutionary and cognitive) and Neurodidactics or Neuropedagogy, which is the specific area that concerns us.

en_USEnglish